On 24/06/2008, David Herron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Andrew John Hughes wrote: > > > 2008/6/23 Dalibor Topic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > > > Mark Wielaard wrote: > > > > > > > > OT, but the mention of binary plugs in the slides made me question > > whether they are still relevant given IcedTea passed > > the JCK without any? For OpenJDK6, is this now just the optional SNMP > > support? It would be good if someone could > > make it clear what's still needed for OpenJDK6 and OpenJDK7 (which > > seem to differ in this respect too). > > IcedTea probably needs a cleanout in terms of long-dead binary plugs > > it still tries to provide. > > > > > > The slides were originally written in Feb/March back when we still needed > the plugs. And at the time of JavaOne none of us had incorporated Gervill. > I did say in the session that we were all on the verge of being 100% and > that soon the plugs wouldn't be required. >
Well, we've always done it without plugs, but then we're crazy Free Software people... ;) > Duke is bald and every time I see 'plugs' it makes me think of hair plugs > and Duke with hair doesn't make sense. So of course the plugs have to go. > Ha ha, that's just hilarious! I love the image. > - David Herron > > > > -- Andrew :-) Support Free Java! Contribute to GNU Classpath and the OpenJDK http://www.gnu.org/software/classpath http://openjdk.java.net PGP Key: 94EFD9D8 (http://subkeys.pgp.net) Fingerprint: F8EF F1EA 401E 2E60 15FA 7927 142C 2591 94EF D9D8
