Hi Thorbjørn, On Thu, 2008-06-26 at 16:54 +0200, Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen wrote: > Mark Wielaard skrev den 26-06-2008 08:31: > > > >> The script first looks for an awk and finds /usr/bin/nawk, and then > >> explicitly later looks for gawk. export GAWK=/usr/bin/nawk got me over > >> that test. > >> > > It explicitly tests for gawk since that is what the build says it > > requires. > > > Good reason! > > > dnl OpenJDK's README-builds.html lists gawk as a build dependency so we > > dnl check for it explicitly rather than using AC_PROG_AWK. > > FIND_TOOL([GAWK], [gawk]) > > > > > >> It requires both an ecj.jar and a libgcj.jar. Are both necessary? > >> > > Yes, one is a compiler and one is a core class library set. > > > But are they necessary if there is a Java6 JDK available? This IS > Solaris :)
If you already have a bootstrapped icedtea or openjdk on the system then it isn't strictly necessary and you can also configure --with-icedtea or --with-openjdk and it will use that for the bootstrapping phase. See also ./configure --help for some more options to specify the "home dir" for these installations if you got them in a non-default place. > >> I'll look at building lesstif and see what happens then... > >> > > This really shouldn't be necessary anymore. At least not for > > icedtea/jdk7, there might still be some header constants used in > > icedtea6/openjdk6, but if so we should backport the fixes to remove them > > and remove this check. > > > I think I'll continue this discussion up on the icetea list. My fingers > cannot get used to the missing Reply-to header on this list. I CCed the icedtea list (distro-pkg-dev), but that (luckily) also doesn't do the harmful reply-to header munging (but that is probably another bikeshed flamewar waiting to happen...). Cheers, Mark