Porting OpenJDK to be an actual cygwin program, rather than just being built using cygwin tools, is an obvious target for open source porters. The cygwinized OpenJDK would be available as part of the Cygwin distribution. Obviously a porter would have to fight with many assumptions currently being made in the Makefiles.
Martin On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 4:34 PM, Dalibor Topic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Erik Trimble wrote: >> >> Dalibor Topic wrote: >>> >>> Erik Trimble wrote: >>>> >>>> Also, Cygwin is the UNIX-ism platform of choice, and getting the JDK to >>>> build solely with Cygwin (on both 32- and 64-bit, Win2k, WinXP, and >>>> Win2003) >>>> would be a _huge_ deal. >>> >>> I.e. using the gcc provided by Cygwin and the 'posixy' libc it provides? >>> >>> cheers, >>> dalibor topic >>> >> I certainly can't speak for Sun on this. But, I don't think there is any >> immediate plans to use GCC on Windows. It would probably be OK if someone >> wanted to try, but I can't imagine it being even remotely easy. There's >> just so much stuff dependent on the various Visual Studio or MS SDK header >> files, that I'm almost positive you have to install them to do the build, so >> why bother with GCC? > > I'm somewhat curious whether having OpenJDK packaged in Cygwin (and ant, > etc.) would make our life easier on windows builds, though I'm not really > hot on going down a rabbit hole if it has no benefit to OpenJDK. > > cheers, > dalibor topic > > > -- > ******************************************************************* > Dalibor Topic Tel: (+49 40) 23 646 738 > Java F/OSS Ambassador AIM: robiladonaim > Sun Microsystems GmbH Mobile: (+49 177) 2664 192 > Nagelsweg 55 http://openjdk.java.net > D-20097 Hamburg mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sitz der Gesellschaft: Sonnenallee 1, D-85551 Kirchheim-Heimstetten > Amtsgericht München: HRB 161028 > Geschäftsführer: Thomas Schröder, Wolfgang Engels, Dr. Roland Bömer > Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrates: Martin Häring > >
