On 24/11/2008, Niklas Wirstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi All, > thanks for all the answers. You are very helpful. I followed the advice of > using icedTea, and that build without problems. > > Andrew, here is what I did to try to build openJDK. The file make.output is > attached. > > wget > http://www.java.net/download/jdk7/archive/b39/jdk-7-ea-src-b39-jrl-06_nov_2008.jar > wget > http://www.java.net/download/jdk7/archive/b39/jdk-7-ea-bin-b39-jrl-06_nov_2008.jar > wget > http://www.java.net/download/jdk7/archive/b39/jdk-7-ea-mozilla_headers-b39-unix-06_nov_2008.jar >
Err... these aren't the right tarballs for OpenJDK. I just use the one: openjdk-7-ea-src-b40-20_nov_2008.zip and this is what IcedTea (hg) also downloads. The jrl in the filename suggests these are proprietary bundles under the Java Research License... > > #I installed the bundles to the same directory > (/home1/niwi/record-replay/java/openJava) > java -jar jdk-7-ea-bin-b39-jrl-06_nov_2008.jar > java -jar > jdk-7-ea-mozilla_headers-b39-unix-06_nov_2008.jar > java -jar jdk-7-ea-src-b39-jrl-06_nov_2008.jar > > cd /home1/niwi/record-replay/java/openJava > > unset CLASSPATH JAVA_HOME > > export ALT_MOZILLA_HEADERS_PATH=$(pwd)/share/plugin > export ALT_BOOTDIR=/usr/lib/jvm/java-6-sun > > make sanity #Note: The sanity check passes even if ALT_BOOTDIR is unset > make &> make.output > > > > Andrew John Hughes wrote: > > > 2008/11/21 Kelly O'Hair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > > > Sorry, I meant to explicitly call out the 3 "WARNING:" messages. > > > The bcopy problem is a separate thing, more serious and needs to be > > > fix in OpenJDK sources. Glad to hear that IcedTea has them fixed. > > > > > > > > > > > > > We just remove the offending lines from > > openjdk/hotspot/src/share/vm/libadt/port.hpp which works > on GNU/Linux > > platforms but I'm not sure if anyone has built the result on Solaris. > > > > > > > > > The 3 "WARNING:"s are coming from the > jdk/make/common/shared/Sanity.gmk > > > file but they are surrounded with "ifndef OPENJDK" and by default > > > the variable OPENJDK should be set. > > > These messages were for the closed or JRL built JDK, and will be deleted > > > soon. > > > > > > So my concern is, how did they come out in a OPENJDK=true build? > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm not sure; I've not seen this on any of the numerous occasions I've > > built OpenJDK and OpenJDK6. FWIW, we build with: > > > > "ALT_JDK_IMPORT_PATH=$(ICEDTEA_BOOT_DIR)" \ > > "ANT_HOME=$(SYSTEM_ANT_DIR)" \ > > "BUILD_NUMBER=$(OPENJDK_VERSION)" \ > > "JDK_UPDATE_VERSION=$(JDK_UPDATE_VERSION)" \ > > "JRE_RELEASE_VERSION=1.7.0_$(COMBINED_VERSION)" \ > > "LANG=C" \ > > > "PATH=$(abs_top_builddir)/bootstrap/jdk1.6.0/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin" > > \ > > "ALT_BOOTDIR=$(ICEDTEA_BOOT_DIR)" \ > > > "ALT_BINARY_PLUGS_PATH=$(abs_top_builddir)/bootstrap/jdk1.7.0" > \ > > "BUILD_ARCH_DIR=$(BUILD_ARCH_DIR)" \ > > "ICEDTEA_RT=$(ICEDTEA_RT)" \ > > "ICEDTEA_BUILD_DIR=$(ICEDTEA_BUILD_DIR)" \ > > "ICEDTEA_CLS_DIR=$(ICEDTEA_CLS_DIR)" \ > > "ICEDTEA_ENDORSED_DIR=$(ICEDTEA_ENDORSED_DIR)" \ > > > "ENDORSED=-Djava.endorsed.dirs=$(ICEDTEA_ENDORSED_DIR)" \ > > "CLASSPATH=" \ > > "LD_LIBRARY_PATH=" \ > > "ICEDTEA_CORE_BUILD=$(ICEDTEA_CORE_BUILD)" \ > > "ICEDTEA_ZERO_BUILD=$(ICEDTEA_ZERO_BUILD)" \ > > "ICEDTEA_SHARK_BUILD=$(ICEDTEA_SHARK_BUILD)" \ > > "ZERO_LIBARCH=$(ZERO_LIBARCH)" \ > > "ZERO_BITSPERWORD=$(ZERO_BITSPERWORD)" \ > > "ZERO_ENDIANNESS=$(ZERO_ENDIANNESS)" \ > > "ZERO_ARCHDEF=$(ZERO_ARCHDEF)" \ > > "ZERO_ARCHFLAG=$(ZERO_ARCHFLAG)" \ > > "LIBFFI_CFLAGS=$(LIBFFI_CFLAGS)" \ > > "LIBFFI_LIBS=$(LIBFFI_LIBS)" \ > > "LLVM_CFLAGS=$(LLVM_CFLAGS)" \ > > "LLVM_LDFLAGS=$(LLVM_LDFLAGS)" \ > > "LLVM_LIBS=$(LLVM_LIBS)" \ > > "FREETYPE2_HEADERS=$(FREETYPE2_CFLAGS)" \ > > "FT2_LIB=$(FREETYPE2_LIBS)" \ > > "ALT_PARALLEL_COMPILE_JOBS=$(PARALLEL_JOBS)" \ > > "HOTSPOT_BUILD_JOBS=$(PARALLEL_JOBS)" \ > > "JAVAC=" \ > > "RHINO_JAR=$(RHINO_JAR)" \ > > "DISTRIBUTION_ID=$(DIST_ID)" > > > > A lot of that's IcedTea-specific or designed to ensure that > > options/binaries defined by configure are passed down to the OpenJDK > > make process. It would be useful to know how Niklas is building > > OpenJDK. > > > > > > > -kto > > > > > > Andrew John Hughes wrote: > > > > > > > > > > 2008/11/21 Kelly O'Hair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > > > > > > > > > You can ignore the 3 WARNINGS, they will be removed soon. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have to admit I've never seen those warnings. I'm sure I don't need > > > > to say I'm not running a 2.4 copy of Linux. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > However, I'm 99.9% sure that these error messages should not be seen > > > > > at all when building the OpenJDK sources. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We've patched bcopy and friends out in IcedTea, so clearly others have > > > > run into them. Matthias Koch, who packages IcedTea for Debian/Ubuntu, > > > > added the patch so you'd have to ask him. Maybe a newer gcc promotes > > > > them from warnings to errors? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Exactly where did you get the sources from? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Probably http://openjdk.java.net, that's where I get mine :) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -kto > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I am trying to build the open JDK from source (using the b39 > snapshot > > > > > > release) on Ubuntu 8.10, but I get the following error message: > > > > > > > > > > > > In file included from > ../generated/incls/_precompiled.incl:286: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > /home1/niwi/record-replay/java/openJava/fifth-try/hotspot/src/share/vm/libadt/port.hpp: > > > > > > In function 'void bcopy(const void*, void*, size_t)': > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > /home1/niwi/record-replay/java/openJava/fifth-try/hotspot/src/share/vm/libadt/port.hpp:40: > > > > > > error: 'void bcopy(const void*, void*, size_t)' redeclared inline > > > > > > without > > > > > > 'gnu_inline' attribute > > > > > > /usr/include/bits/string3.h:90: error: 'void > bcopy(const void*, void*, > > > > > > size_t)' previously defined here > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The sanity test passes, but with the following warnings: > > > > > > > > > > > > WARNING: The official linux builds use OS version 2.4.9-e.3. > > > > > > You appear to be using OS version 2.6.27-7-generic. > > > > > > > > > > > > WARNING: The build is being done on Linux Unknown linux. > > > > > > The official linux builds use Linux Advanced Server, > > > > > > specifically Linux Advanced Server release 2.1AS. > > > > > > The version found was '2.6.27-7-generic'. > > > > > > > > > > > > WARNING: The linux compiler is not version 3.2 > > > > > > Specifically the GCC compiler. > > > > > > You appear to be using compiler version: 4.3 > > > > > > The compiler was obtained from the following location: > > > > > > /usr/bin/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Any suggestions? > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > /Niklas > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Andrew :-) Support Free Java! Contribute to GNU Classpath and the OpenJDK http://www.gnu.org/software/classpath http://openjdk.java.net PGP Key: 94EFD9D8 (http://subkeys.pgp.net) Fingerprint: F8EF F1EA 401E 2E60 15FA 7927 142C 2591 94EF D9D8
