John Coomes wrote: > Mark Wielaard ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: >> Hi John, >> >> On Thu, 2008-12-04 at 10:53 -0800, John Coomes wrote: >>>>> 32-bit systems are unaffected (not sure why). >>>> It's a bug. The code is basically this: >>>> ... >>> This is http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=6679422. FWIW, the >>> trivial fix is in jdk7: >>> >>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jdk7/hotspot/rev/092ea87cc974 >> In the icedtea-signed-types.patch (part of the PPC work for zero and >> cacao from Gary and Christian [1]) the fix is to cast it to (in_addr_t), >> which seems slightly cleaner to me since you already have that as >> typedef. > > Hi Mark, > > IIRC, the in_addr_t typedef is missing on windows. I'll double check > before submitting a fix.
Probably is. Maybe int32_t is the best portable solution, unpleasant tho' it is. Andrew.
