2009/5/14 Tim Bell <tim.b...@sun.com>: > Andrew John Hughes wrote: > >> b58 also contains a fix for >> http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6565364 but this >> appears to have been rolled in with >> http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6529590 so that the >> bug has not been updated and the ID is not included in the changeset: >> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jdk7/corba/rev/e149090eb21a > > Good catch, thank you. >
The IcedTea build process does it again! :) (We've been maintaining the patch locally so when it appeared upstream, a conflict arose in applying our patch) > These changes came forward en-masse from OpenJDK6 and I missed 6565364. I > updated 6565364 a few minutes ago and marked it fix-delivered in OpenJDK7 > b58. > Thanks. > I can't retroactively fix the changeset comment - sorry about that. > No problem, I only mentioned that because I guess it's why the bug wasn't updated. > Tim > > Cheers, -- Andrew :-) Free Java Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com) Support Free Java! Contribute to GNU Classpath and the OpenJDK http://www.gnu.org/software/classpath http://openjdk.java.net PGP Key: 94EFD9D8 (http://subkeys.pgp.net) Fingerprint: F8EF F1EA 401E 2E60 15FA 7927 142C 2591 94EF D9D8
