Lana Steuck said the following on 03/11/11 07:03:
On 03/10/2011 08:46 AM, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
Interesting point, we will need to decide which projects need jdk8
forests. I imagine some will not, and we may be
doing a little trimming down on the number of team forests.
Makes sense. There are some team forests (at least one that I know of)
that are not being used, so we can look into removing those and maybe
combining those team forests which have more interdependencies into one
forest (provided that the team members agree).
I've never been a fan of the "all projects are complete forests". It
just increases the conceptual complexity of the repositories and the
workload of keeping all the forests sync'ed up. It should be easy to add
additional repositories to a project as the need arises, without
requiring all repositories.
David
