Maybe you should call "hg qpop -a" before pulling from the source.
I don't know how to fix a damaged repo, but you can always re-clone the
repos to a new directory, and then copy your old .hg/patches directory
to the new repo. Please do not copy the status file otherwise Mercurial
might be confused. Then you should be able to qseries/qpush them.
Hope this helps.
-Max
On 01/31/2012 12:50 PM, Pete Brunet wrote:
Hi David, It might help to know that I had pulled the code back in
September or so, made several changes, and then got diverted onto
another project for a while. So now I'm trying to get back in sync with
the latest code. The first thing I did was update my patch with hg
qrefresh and then from cygwin ran get_source to update the code. So
it's quite possible I will have merge conflicts, but I don't know the
process to find and fix them in this case. Or maybe I should start from
scratch, apply my patch and fix the issues that way. I seem to remember
that the one time I did have a problem applying a patch to fresh clone I
was able to fix them. -Pete
On 1/30/12 8:56 PM, David Holmes wrote:
Pete,
On 31/01/2012 12:45 PM, Pete Brunet wrote:
I just did the following:
sh ./get_source.sh
and got this:
<snip>
# cd ./jdk&& hg pull -u
pulling from http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/jdk8//jdk
searching for changes
adding changesets
adding manifests
adding file changes
added 563 changesets with 3123 changes to 2661 files (+1 heads)
not updating: crosses branches (merge branches or update --check to
force update)
# exit code 0
This shouldn't be possible. get_source will first clone the repos then
do a hg pull (why? Given it just cloned it!)
It may be that you were extremely unlucky and between the clone and
the pull there was an integration push to the repo. Even so you
shouldn't get multiple heads. ???
How do I fix this? I haven't found instructions on the various OpenJDK
sites.
Delete the jdk repo and start again is all I can suggested to get back
to a sane state.
David
-----
Pete
