On Sep 10, 2012, at 9:24 AM, Jonathan Gibbons wrote: > On 09/11/2012 07:45 AM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote: >> On 2012-09-11 01:00, Jonathan Gibbons wrote: >>> Can we have a makefile target that invokes your script? E.g. make >>> full-build. >>> >>> It is easier to document the list of public targets supported by the >>> Makefiles than to describe a set of assorted extra scripts. And, it would >>> fit more uniformly into the JPRT infrastructure. >> >> I agree that the boot cycle build fits better in as a make target. >> >> I have written an alternative solution for performing a boot cycle build, >> which I am about to check in. Now there is a new target, "bootcycle-images" >> which basically does: >> 1) make images >> 2) make images but with a new output directory >> (build/<conf-name>/bootcycle-build) and using the previously build image as >> bootjdk, instead of the one specified to configure. >> >> As a result of implementing this, the autoconf files got some nice cleanup >> and refactoring as well. :-) >> >> /Magnus > > That sounds great; well done, and thank you. > > -- Jon
That sounds fine. -kto
