It's now marked as resolved.
Thanks,
Brad
On 9/27/2012 9:58 AM, Andrew Hughes wrote:
----- Original Message -----
----- Original Message -----
Will you be putting this back yourself? If so let me know when
you
go
in, and I can update the bug once you're in.
I will, though I'll need a bug ID for it. I presume tl is ok as
the
forest to use?
This going into 8? Then yes.
At first, yes. Do you have any objections to me proposing it for 7u
too, in due course?
7201205: Add Makefile configuration option to build with unlimited
crypto in OpenJDK.
Great, thanks! I'll push it.
All done: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/9e879c0288c2
Brad
Mark wrote:
> The summary is that it was just easier to remove unused
> classes
> that
> made the code tricky to understand for no good reason except
> for
> some
> secret proprietary code.
Unfortunately, Oracle and some of our commercial (non-OpenJDK)
licensees
still depend on that tricky code. :( I'd personally love to
strip
it
all out, but we have to balance all of its consumers (Oracle SE
and
ME,
commercial source/binary licensees, OpenJDK, etc.)
Andrew wrote:
> I'm sure it would be easy enough to dump those classes if
> Oracle
> started producing OpenJDK binaries licensed under the GPL,
> rather
> than binaries from their proprietary fork.
Unfortunately, not likely in our current export/import climate.
Yes, this is what I thought. We just have to make sure to test
well
before shipping binaries.
Brad
--
Andrew :)
Free Java Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)
PGP Key: 248BDC07 (https://keys.indymedia.org/)
Fingerprint = EC5A 1F5E C0AD 1D15 8F1F 8F91 3B96 A578 248B DC07
