OK, as long as you're picking up the right bits, the packaging details
do not matter quite so much, since these jars are only used temporarily
during the build process.
-- Jon
On 11/26/2012 08:25 AM, Erik Joelsson wrote:
Yes, and the bootstrap jar for javadoc does actually contain all of
it. The only difference between bootstrap javac.jar and bootstrap
javadoc.jar is the manifest. I'm not sure this is a good idea, but
it's the way it currently works in build-infra.
/Erik
On 2012-11-26 17:16, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
The changes to common/makefiles/javadoc/Javadoc.gmk look suspect.
One way or another, you need all of the classes from javadoc, javac
and doclets on the bootclasspath.
-- Jon
On 11/26/2012 08:10 AM, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
Looks good to me.
-kto
On Nov 26, 2012, at 3:01 AM, Erik Joelsson wrote:
I have fixed the docs target and added support for comparing the
generated docs with the old build.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~erikj/8003844/webrev.01/
/Erik
