On 7/29/13 9:53 PM, David Holmes wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> On 30/07/2013 12:31 PM, Pete Brunet wrote:
>> Looking through the corba section of the make debug log I don't see any
>> errors other than two occurrences of this line:
>>
>> find: ‘/cy/cygdrive/c/Users/Pete/JDK8/jdk8/corba/src/share/classes’:
>> No such file or directory
>>
>> Is that indicative of anything wrong? The prefix and suffix sure look
>> strange and that directory nzmd (minus the garbage) does exist.
>
> Yes this is a recently discovered bug affecting some systems. See
> 8021430. Workaround (from the bug):
>
> "A little deeper investigation revealed that a call to macro at
> corba/makefiles/BuildCorba.gmk:147 goes to macro "SetupIdlCompilation"
> defined in common/makefiles/IdlCompilation.gmk . The abspath function
> was mangling the path. Commenting out line 87 and 88 (to remove
> abspath's effect on the paths) enabled the build to succeed . "
>
> I just raised the priority of that bug. Not clear what the critical
> environmental factors are.
Thank you David, That was it!!!  Thanks very much for your help.  I can
go to bed a much happier man :-)  Good to raise the priority.  I lost
Friday, half a day Saturday, and a long Monday.  My environment is: 64
bit W7, cygwin, dual core Lenovo T500.  I'll be happy to provide any
other info on my build if need be.

Pete
>
> David
> -----
>
>
>> Pete
>>
>> On 7/29/13 7:13 PM, Pete Brunet wrote:
>>> Thanks Phil,
>>>
>>> No luck looking through the log so far but will keep looking.
>>>
>>> BTW, I grep'd for BindingListHolder in all the IDL files under jdk8
>>> with
>>> no matches.
>>>
>>> Pete
>>>
>>> On 7/29/13 12:36 PM, Phil Race wrote:
>>>> On 7/29/2013 10:25 AM, Pete Brunet wrote:
>>>>> Thanks Phil, I found
>>>>> build\windows-x86-normal-server-fastdebug\corba\gensrc and in that
>>>>> dir
>>>>> is one file _the_idls.d with one line
>>>>> IDLS_ARE_CREATED=yes
>>>>>
>>>>> Pete
>>>>>
>>>> Hmm .. in my case that is there but there are also com & org
>>>> directories with
>>>> in all about 3Mb of generated sources. So the first failure is really
>>>> somewhere
>>>> before where you are seeing it reported.
>>>>
>>>> If you aren't already, build with LOG=debug
>>>>
>>>> -phil.
>>

Reply via email to