----- Original Message ----- > Hi Omair, > > > Should I be pushing this to jdk9/dev ? (Or to jdk9/client?) > > If you change client code, then the fix should go to the client repo to > avoid merge conflicts and allow for more manual testing prior to > integrating the changes into the master repo.
Perhaps this would be an appropriate point to clarify what constitutes 'client code'? > > -- > best regards, > Anthony > > On 2/19/2014 8:16 PM, Omair Majid wrote: > > * Magnus Ihse Bursie <magnus.ihse.bur...@oracle.com> [2014-02-19 06:59]: > >> On 2014-02-17 10:16, Erik Joelsson wrote: > >>> At least to me this looks good, but better let Magnus and Andrew > >>> have their say too. > >> > >> Looks good to me! > > > > Thanks for the reviews, everyone! > > > > I have filed https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8035341 to track > > the issue. Can someone please point me some docs that explains what I > > need to do to to this bug once I have pushed the fix? > > > > Should I be pushing this to jdk9/dev ? (Or to jdk9/client?) > > > > Thanks, > > Omair > > > Thanks, -- Andrew :) Free Java Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com) PGP Key: 248BDC07 (https://keys.indymedia.org/) Fingerprint = EC5A 1F5E C0AD 1D15 8F1F 8F91 3B96 A578 248B DC07