Hi Andrew, > Separating debuginfo is not > something that we want the OpenJDK build to do, and the most useful > thing that we could have is a switch to turn all of OpenJDK's > stripping and separate debuginfo off. I expect the same applies to > all distros.
My patch provides "SEPARATED_DEBUGINFO_FILES" as a switch of separating debuginfo files, and affects "STRIP_POILCY" in HotSpot and other ELF binaries. > I expect the same applies to all distros. We need to pass ' STRIP_POLICY=no_strip POST_STRIP_CMD="" ' to make command as David said. And we need to pick up binaries which are NOT named ".debuginfo" or ".diz" suffix. Thanks, Yasumasa On 2014/03/03 18:46, Andrew Haley wrote: > On 03/01/2014 11:08 PM, Mike Duigou wrote: > >> Do I understand correctly that rpmbuild can only deal with >> unstripped binaries and generates the stripped rpm package and >> debuginfo package. > > Exactly. OpenJDK generating separate debuginfo files is very > inconvenient for RPM builds. > >> It sounds kind of strange that find-debuginfo.sh wouldn't be able to >> use already generated debuginfo files. > > The OpenJDK build can't have any idea of what debuginfo files the > distro runtime requires, and indeed this may change. There is more > than one mechanism for finding debuginfo. Separating debuginfo is not > something that we want the OpenJDK build to do, and the most useful > thing that we could have is a switch to turn all of OpenJDK's > stripping and separate debuginfo off. I expect the same applies to > all distros. > > Andrew. >
