Peter, After local clone your .hg/hgrc file contains
[paths] default = <your location> instead of http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/hs-rt You have to fix it to do update/push. And it's the only thing you have to fix. -Dmitry On 2014-04-14 20:13, Pete Brunet wrote: > > On 4/12/14 4:32 AM, Dmitry Samersoff wrote: >> Peter, >> >> It's perfectly fine to just copy entire forest. >> >> Local clone is faster than copy, but you have to restore .hg/hgrc >> afterward if you plan to do the push from this workspace. > Hi Dimitri, I tried local clone first and that was the first thing I > noticed so I was concerned there might be other problems and decided to > cp my directory instead. Is the .hg/hgrc the only file I'd need to copy > after local cloning? >> >> My typical workflow: >> >> 1. The script mirrors hs-rt and dev to dedicated machine every night. It >> is always a full clone from scratch. >> >> 3. Starting a new CR, I create a directory with CR number, file called >> "comments" with ojdk push message and copy nightly workspace to it. >> >> 4. When fix is ready, I create a webrev against local ws (webrev -N) and >> put it to cr.openjdk.java.net using sshfs or special script. >> >> 5. After all reviews, I go to one of shared server, clone fresh >> workspace, apply patch form webrev to it and submit a commit job. > Thanks for that. >> >> -Dmitry >> >> >> On 2014-04-12 05:12, Pete Brunet wrote: >>> Hi Jon, I am on VPN from Austin. It has always taken forever. And >>> downloading programs from the internet when on VPN takes forever. I >>> started looking into this a while back and I don't know if this is the >>> issue but I found that the DNS servers are in Europe when I am on VPN. >>> Right now as reported by ipconfig /all my Cisco AnyConnect DNS servers are: >>> >>> 144.20.190.70 in Madrid >>> 192.135.82.132 in Amsterdam >>> >>> Pete >>> >>> On 4/11/14 7:07 PM, Jonathan Gibbons wrote: >>>> To me, this message raises the questions of "why does it take >>>> forever?" and, "how long should it take?" >>>> >>>> I see a wide range of expectations. Some folk can clone fast, and >>>> assume that everyone else can as well. And then there's reports like >>>> this, that it takes "forever". >>>> >>>> I'm all in favor of doing whatever it takes to speed up the workflow, >>>> but where is the threshold between "yeah, it really does take this >>>> long" and "if it takes this long, something must be broken"? >>>> >>>> -- Jon >>>> >>>> >>>> On 04/11/2014 04:26 PM, Pete Brunet wrote: >>>>> Since it takes forever to clone on my Win machine, in the case where I >>>>> want to work on several bugs, is it OK to instead clone the first >>>>> directory and then cp -ar that to n additional directories? -Pete >> > -- Dmitry Samersoff Oracle Java development team, Saint Petersburg, Russia * I would love to change the world, but they won't give me the sources.
