Hi Petr,

I ran the following query:

https://www.google.com/#q=custom+flavormap.properties

and the search yielded the following forum thread:

https://community.oracle.com/thread/1293314?start=0&tstart=0

where developers seem to suggest they do edit the $JDKHOME/jre/lib/flavormap.properties file sometimes.


Do we officially declare that we drop support for this possibility?

--
best regards,
Anthony

On 6/19/2014 4:24 PM, Petr Pchelko wrote:
Hello, Alan.

Thank you for the review.

Do we know if anyone has been editing the file in ${java.home}/lib?
I couldn't find any examples on the internet although I've done a very
extensive search, so I we could add a property later if someone would
request it.

With best regards. Petr.

On 19 июня 2014 г., at 16:13, Alan Bateman <alan.bate...@oracle.com
<mailto:alan.bate...@oracle.com>> wrote:

On 19/06/2014 12:17, Petr Pchelko wrote:
Hello,

Please review the fix for the issue:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8047336
The fix is available at:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~pchelko/9/8047336/webrev.00/

This is another step in datatransfer modularization work. This part of the work 
needs a CCC, so I've moved it out to a separate fix. The CCC will be filed once 
the fix is settled.

Multiple changes are happening here:
1. Afterhttp://ccc.us.oracle.com/8005250  the flavormap.properties and 
AWT.DnD.flavorMapFileURL Toolkit property was removed from the public API. 
However one mention was forgotten and I'm removing it now, see changes in 
Toolkit.java
2. For modules we need to move flavormap.properties out of the jre/lib. I'm not 
sure about the new location. Can I add properties to the java.awt.datatransfer 
package? Wouldn't they be considered public in this case?
3. The AWT.DnD.flavorMapFileURL Toolkit property cannot be set by the user and 
it's not used by us. So I'm removing it.
4. As flavormap.properties is not editable by the user any more, I'm changing 
it's format to get significant simplification of the parsing code.

There's no way left to change the default mappings now, but we have public 
supported API to create new mappings in the Java code. System property could be 
added to provide alternative properties location, but I don't think it's 
required.

The dropping of the reference to flavormap.properties from
java.awt.Toolkit looks okay to me.

I skimmed through the changes to java.awt.datatransfer.SystemFlavorMap
(not a detailed review) and it looks okay. I cannot comment on the
changes to format as I don't know the history in this area to
understand the issues around duplicates.

On your question about introducing a system property to allow the
configuration be picked up from some other (non-JDK) location then it
doesn't sound like there is a strong case. Do we know if anyone has
been editing the file in ${java.home}/lib? I assume that if there is a
strong need then it could be possible to introducing it in the future
without conflicting with anything that you are doing here.

-Alan.

Reply via email to