On 25/05/2015 09:53, Chris Hegarty wrote:
If it is agreed that these files are needed, then I can look at
expanding the ImageBuilder to do concatenate them.
I agree with Mandy's point that java.security should be change to list
the provider name rather than the class name. If that happens then it
means that the service configuration files will be required.
I don't have a strong view on whether the concatenation is done via make
files or the image builder as it's all just temporary and will go away
once resources are keyed by a module. One thing about rev'ing the image
builder is that we should probably let the jimage refresh get into
jdk9/dev first. I don't think we want to delay that due to merge conflicts.
-Alan
