On 27/05/2015 23:42, Mandy Chung wrote:
Valerie,
Did you see my comment yesterday?
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/security-dev/2015-May/012254.html
Since you have reverted the java.security to keep the classname, to avoid
causing merge conflict to jimage refresh, let’s remove the META-INF files in
the first push and the build change.
The security providers will be loaded via the fallback mechanism (i.e.
ProviderLoader.legacyLoad method). You should keep the ProviderLoader.load
method to take the provider name instead of classname.
I’ll file a bug to follow up to change java.security to list the provider name.
This will wait after the jimage refresh goes into jdk9/dev.
I think that's the best approach and this will also allow the temporary
image build tool to be updated to merge the configuration files.
-Alan
