On 5/12/2015 3:55 AM, Alexander Smundak wrote:
I am not convinced that increasing the complexity of the already quite
intricate build
machinery to avoid three additional checks in the source file is the
right trade-off.
Does that mean you looked at how to achieve this?
I think there is a more general issue that a ppc64le build is-a ppc64
build, so the latter should always be defined.
David
-----
Sasha
On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 11:59 PM, David Holmes <david.hol...@oracle.com> wrote:
On 4/12/2015 4:29 AM, Alexander Smundak wrote:
On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 10:30 PM, David Holmes <david.hol...@oracle.com>
wrote:
agent code:
I'm still unclear why you can't, or shouldn't, pass through -Dppc64 and
-Dppc64le, such that you don't need to check for either being defined ??
You mean, add -Dppc64 to the compilation flags explicitly if the value
of the OPENJDK_TARGET_CPU_LEGACY is 'ppc64le'?
Yes. Is that feasible?
Thanks,
David
Sasha
