The openjdk mailing list server eats attachements. Can you put it on
cr.openjdk.java.net instead?
/Erik
On 2016-02-20 01:27, Andreas Lundblad wrote:
Thought I attached the chart. Here's another attempt.
-- Andreas
On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 10:06:17PM +0100, Andreas Lundblad wrote:
I spent some time measuring the build times of the java modules with different
settings.
Attaching a chart of the result.
Red bars:
- Plain old javac. Sjavac disabled.
Green bars:
- Sjavac, without breaking up each module into multiple javac invocations.
(This is the default setting.)
Blue bars:
- Sjavac where each module is split into three parallel javac invocations.
(Note that even without this parallelism the build still parallelises on a
module level.)
I did the measurements on my laptop (4 core, i7 @ 2.8 GHz). I measured the "make
clean-java; make java-only" so there should have been no native compilations going
on in the background.
I don't think there are any surprises in the chart. Since we're (most of the
time) compiling many modules in parallel we get full CPU utilization without
splitting each module into smaller parts. When splitting into smaller parts, we
get lots of implicit compilation for each part, so we're just wasting lots of
cycles. IF however, one were to do this experiment on a, say, 32 core machine,
one might actually get a small speedup by splitting (because even when we have
lots of modules being compiled in parallel, we have cores to spare). But I'm
not sure considering how small most of the modules are.
-- Andreas
