On 2/25/2016 8:24 PM, David Holmes wrote:
Hi Erik,
On 26/02/2016 12:42 PM, Erik Joelsson wrote:
Here is some more fallout from [1]. The same kind of issue as in [2],
Is there anything in place to ensure that [1] does not push up to
jdk9/jdk9 without these follow up fixes in tow? We are already
unfortunately hitting the problem in the opposite direction with
broken jdk9/dev code being pulled into jdk9/hs and the hotspot group
repos. :(
These failures are on the radar to be resolved before the snapshot is
taken for the next dev -> master integration. If everything goes
according to plan, the snapshot for a dev -> master integration is taken
on Friday for the following week; if there is no suitable build (and
these 32 tests failing would be a disqualification), then a snapshot on
Monday can be taken.
HTH,
-Joe
