Yes, we do, if you don't mind.
/Erik
On 2016-04-02 13:38, Filipp Zhinkin wrote:
Hi Erik, thanks for reply.
Do we need a JBS's ticket to track this issue?
Thanks,
Filipp.
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 5:23 PM, Erik Joelsson <[email protected]> wrote:
It seems the test is indeed incorrect at this point. When I added that test,
the launcher would accept just -Xpatch:. It seems to now accept -Xpatch:foo
so perhaps we should use that for the test.
/Erik
On 2016-03-31 09:56, Filipp Zhinkin wrote:
Hi all,
I'm trying to build OpenJDK from latest sources using JDK9-b111 as a boot
JDK
and configuration script is not able to detect modules support:
$ bash configure --enable-option-checking=fatal
--with-jvm-variants=server --with-debug-level=release
--disable-headful --with-boot-jdk=/home/filipp/Downloads/bootdir/jdk-9
--with-jtreg=/home/filipp/Development/openjdk/jtreg
...
$ grep modules build/linux-x86_64-normal-server-release/configure.log
checking if Boot JDK supports modules... no
I've looked into common/autoconf/boot-jdk.m4 to find out how modules
support is detected and we simply pass '-Xpatch:' to JVM [1]:
jdk-9/bin/java -Xpatch: -version
Bad value for -Xpatch.
Error: Could not create the Java Virtual Machine.
Error: A fatal exception has occurred. Program will exit.
Am I missing something or that check should actually pass
-Xpatch:blablabla?
Regards,
Filipp.
[1]
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/file/03543a758cd5/common/autoconf/boot-jdk.m4#l308
