Creating some other makefiles was not planned as a part of this JEP, Phil.

If the demos are used for testing, do you want me do turn them into manual 
tests?

Shura

> On Mar 3, 2017, at 2:45 PM, Phil Race <philip.r...@oracle.com> wrote:
> 
> And to be clear, the provision for still building these client demos needs to 
> be made BEFORE this is pushed.
> Or at least as *part* of this push.
> Else we will be unable to perform our normal integration testing at this 
> critical juncture of JDK 9 ..
> 
> -phil.
> 
> On 03/03/2017 09:39 AM, Phil Race wrote:
>> What is the plan for ensuring there is still a way to build the client demos 
>> - which are not being removed
>> but just moved. Doesn't this makefile need to be somewhere still ?
>> 
>> -phil.
>> 
>> On 3/3/2017 12:18 AM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
>>> On 2017-03-02 20:33, Alexandre (Shura) Iline wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>> 
>>>> Could you be so kind to review suggested changes for the makefiles to stop 
>>>> producing sales and demos bundle. Pls note that this request only changes 
>>>> the makefiles, it does not remove demos and samples source code, which 
>>>> will be done separately.
>>>> 
>>>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8173801
>>>> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~shurailine/8173801/webrev.02/
>>>> 
>>>> Shura
>>> Looks good to me.
>>> 
>>> Good riddance! :-)
>>> 
>>> /Magnus
>>> 
>> 
> 

Reply via email to