Hi Jon, yes, they are. we will generic-all to each line.
do you think it makes sense to file an RFE for jtreg to report a missed platform specifier as an error? Thanks, -- Igor > On Feb 26, 2018, at 12:02 PM, Jonathan Gibbons <jonathan.gibb...@oracle.com> > wrote: > > If these new problem-list files are destined for use by jtreg, I would > encourage adding a platform specifier on each line, after the bug number. If > you want to mark the test as excluded on all platforms, the convention is to > use "generic-all". > > -- Jon > > > On 2/26/18 11:47 AM, Igor Ignatyev wrote: >> adding build-dev alias >> >> -- Igor >> >>> On Feb 8, 2018, at 3:08 PM, Ekaterina Pavlova >>> <ekaterina.pavl...@oracle.com> wrote: >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> ProblemList.txt files used by makefiles for jtreg testing allow to specify >>> list of tests to be excluded >>> from execution on all or specific platforms. However to test such features >>> like Graal we want to be able >>> to specify list of failed tests which fail in particular JVM mode only. >>> Please review this change which adds support of extra problem list and >>> introduces 2 Graal specific problem list files. >>> - test/hotspot/jtreg/ProblemList-graal.txt >>> - test/jdk/ProblemList-graal.txt >>> >>> >>> JBS: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8197453 >>> webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~epavlova//8197453/webrev.00/ >>> testing: precheckin, tier1 and tier2 with empty EXTRA_PROBLEM_LISTS. >>> testing in Graal mode with >>> EXTRA_PROBLEM_LISTS=ProblemList-graal.txt >>> >>> thanks, >>> -katya >>> >>> p.s. >>> Igor Ignatyev volunteered to sponsor this change. >
