Re: Extensionality Improvement in Main.gmk & Docs.gmk to generate docs

Mon, 30 Apr 2018 08:15:05 -0700 

Hello,

On 2018-04-30 04:14, Archana Nogriya wrote:



However the patch for the second partis related to locating 
jvmti.html, VM's like openj9 has it's own html specs file in different 
location hence we need extension to set it appropriately.



Yes, I see the reason for the change, but my concern was that the patch 
below looks like it's changing 6 lines, but in reality, I can only see a 
difference in one of them. That difference is also the only difference 
needed as far as I can see. I just want confirmation that that is the case.


/Erik

#  Get jvmti.html from the main jvm variant (all variants' jvmti.html 
are identical).
-JVMTI_HTML := 
$(HOTSPOT_OUTPUTDIR)/variant-$(JVM_VARIANT_MAIN)/gensrc/jvmtifiles/jvmti.html

-$(eval $(call SetupCopyFiles, COPY_JVMTI_HTML, \
-    FILES := $(JVMTI_HTML), \
-    DEST := $(DOCS_OUTPUTDIR)/specs, \
-))
-JDK_SPECS_TARGETS += $(COPY_JVMTI_HTML)

+JVMTI_HTML ?= 
$(HOTSPOT_OUTPUTDIR)/variant-$(JVM_VARIANT_MAIN)/gensrc/jvmtifiles/jvmti.html

+$(eval $(call SetupCopyFiles, COPY_JVMTI_HTML, \
+    FILES := $(JVMTI_HTML), \
+    DEST := $(DOCS_OUTPUTDIR)/specs, \
+))
+JDK_SPECS_TARGETS += $(COPY_JVMTI_HTML)

Thanks and Regards
Archana Nogriya




From: Erik Joelsson <erik.joels...@oracle.com>
To: Archana Nogriya <archana.nogr...@uk.ibm.com>
Cc: build-dev@openjdk.java.net, David Holmes <david.hol...@oracle.com>
Date: 27/04/2018 18:05

Subject: Re: Extensionality Improvement in Main.gmk & Docs.gmk to 
generate docs

------------------------------------------------------------------------




Looking at this again, the first part, in Main.gmk, has already been 
addressed in _https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8198425_ 
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__bugs.openjdk.java.net_browse_JDK-2D8198425&d=DwMD-g&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=-MGd855q-LKvODp9rnOf8dEjvpiN59orrOxhf9virII&m=3vzRAU-D2yC7wKbEcUUaW00BZqwtnO0QE2mLK2bedww&s=MTZyeZsgQdHG_dxjTKHpcljddxJiFvJBfxSsSxchz8k&e=>. 
The patch for the second part looks weird. The only real change I can 
see is the ?= for the jvmti.html file. The rest looks like there is no 
difference (and I cannot think of any change needed there either).

/Erik

On 2018-04-27 02:12, Archana Nogriya wrote:
Thanks Erik,

It will be great if you can sponsor for this contribution please.


Thanks and Regards
Archana Nogriya
IBM Java Runtime, Open Java Developer
IBM Hursley
Tel: Internal - 247073, External - +44 (0) 1962 81 7073
Office Mobile: 07500095480
Email: _archana.nogr...@uk.ibm.com_ <mailto:archana.nogr...@uk.ibm.com>




From: Erik Joelsson _<erik.joels...@oracle.com>_ 
<mailto:erik.joels...@oracle.com>
To: Archana Nogriya _<archana.nogr...@uk.ibm.com>_ 
<mailto:archana.nogr...@uk.ibm.com>, _build-...@openjdk.java.net_ 
<mailto:build-dev@openjdk.java.net>
Cc: David Holmes _<david.hol...@oracle.com>_ 
<mailto:david.hol...@oracle.com>

Date: 26/04/2018 17:15

Subject: Re: Extensionality Improvement in Main.gmk & Docs.gmk to 
generate docs

------------------------------------------------------------------------



Looks reasonable.
/Erik

On 2018-04-26 04:00, Archana Nogriya wrote:

If we have a conditional variable to set 
"hotspot-$(JVM_VARIANT_MAIN)-gensrc" target then this can give way to 
alternate VMs like eclipse openj9 to extend that to set it appropriately.


diff --git a/make/Main.gmk b/make/Main.gmk
index 731e9c9934..444a835cb4 100644
--- a/make/Main.gmk
+++ b/make/Main.gmk
@@ -830,7 +830,8 @@ else
   docs-reference-api-modulegraph: exploded-image buildtools-modules

   # The gensrc steps for hotspot and jdk.jdi create html spec files.
-  docs-jdk-specs: jdk.jdi-gensrc \
+  JVM_DOCS_SPEC_TARGET ?= hotspot-$(JVM_VARIANT_MAIN)-gensrc
+  docs-jdk-specs: $(JVM_DOCS_SPEC_TARGET) jdk.jdi-gensrc \
       docs-jdk-index


######################################################################################

diff --git a/make/Docs.gmk b/make/Docs.gmk
index 644ffbf74a..73ffb8ebd2 100644
--- a/make/Docs.gmk
+++ b/make/Docs.gmk
@@ -561,12 +561,12 @@ $(eval $(call SetupCopyFiles, COPY_JDWP_PROTOCOL, \
 JDK_SPECS_TARGETS += $(COPY_JDWP_PROTOCOL)


#  Get jvmti.html from the main jvm variant (all variants' jvmti.html 
are identical).
-JVMTI_HTML := 
$(HOTSPOT_OUTPUTDIR)/variant-$(JVM_VARIANT_MAIN)/gensrc/jvmtifiles/jvmti.html

-$(eval $(call SetupCopyFiles, COPY_JVMTI_HTML, \
-    FILES := $(JVMTI_HTML), \
-    DEST := $(DOCS_OUTPUTDIR)/specs, \
-))
-JDK_SPECS_TARGETS += $(COPY_JVMTI_HTML)

+JVMTI_HTML ?= 
$(HOTSPOT_OUTPUTDIR)/variant-$(JVM_VARIANT_MAIN)/gensrc/jvmtifiles/jvmti.html

+$(eval $(call SetupCopyFiles, COPY_JVMTI_HTML, \
+    FILES := $(JVMTI_HTML), \
+    DEST := $(DOCS_OUTPUTDIR)/specs, \
+))
+JDK_SPECS_TARGETS += $(COPY_JVMTI_HTML)

Note: This proposal has been tested in local.

Thanks and Regards
Archana Nogriya
IBM Java Runtime, Open Java Developer
IBM Hursley
Tel: Internal - 247073, External - +44 (0) 1962 81 7073
Office Mobile: 07500095480
Email: _archana.nogr...@uk.ibm.com_ <mailto:archana.nogr...@uk.ibm.com>

Unless stated otherwise above:

IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with 
number 741598.

Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU




Unless stated otherwise above:

IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with 
number 741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 
3AU





Unless stated otherwise above:

IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with 
number 741598.

Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
























					Reply via email to