> On 22 Jun 2018, at 23:16, Ekaterina Pavlova <ekaterina.pavl...@oracle.com> > wrote: > > Erik, Doug, > > thank you a lot for your reviews and advises. > I fixed everything what Erik has pointed out, please see my answers inlined. > As about moving more staff in 'updategraalinopenjdk' can we consider this as > next step? > I am not quite familiar with 'updategraalinopenjdk' and didn't contribute > into Graal ws yet, > so I will prefer to do this improvement/refactoring as part of separate JDK > issue. Sorry for not being clearer. I don't expect you to fix/enhance updategraalinopenjdk. I was simply commenting on a possible solution to Joel's reasonable request for having Graal sources and test layout more normalized in the JDK code base. -Doug
- Re: RFR(M): 8205207: Port Graal unit tests under jtreg Erik Joelsson
- Re: RFR(M): 8205207: Port Graal unit tests under j... Doug Simon
- Re: RFR(M): 8205207: Port Graal unit tests under j... Ekaterina Pavlova
- Re: RFR(M): 8205207: Port Graal unit tests und... Doug Simon
- Re: RFR(M): 8205207: Port Graal unit tests... Doug Simon
- Re: RFR(M): 8205207: Port Graal unit tests... Ekaterina Pavlova
- Re: RFR(M): 8205207: Port Graal unit tests und... Erik Joelsson
- Re: RFR(M): 8205207: Port Graal unit tests... Ekaterina Pavlova
- Re: RFR(M): 8205207: Port Graal unit t... Erik Joelsson
- Re: RFR(M): 8205207: Port Graal u... Ekaterina Pavlova
- Re: RFR(M): 8205207: Port Graal unit t... Magnus Ihse Bursie
- Re: RFR(M): 8205207: Port Graal u... Ekaterina Pavlova
- Re: RFR(M): 8205207: Port Gra... Ekaterina Pavlova
- Re: RFR(M): 8205207: Port... Erik Joelsson