On 2/08/2018 4:18 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:


On 2018-08-01 18:46, David Holmes wrote:
Hi Magnus,

On 2/08/2018 11:40 AM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
The build documentation misleadingly states that it is not recommended to build without cross compilation on aarch64. This patch updates the documentation. (I apologize for taking so long to address this. :-()

Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8182733
WebRev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ihse/JDK-8182733-update-aarch64-build-docs/webrev.01



AFAIK there are still 2 different 64-bit ARM builds possible depending on which port is used: one native (Aarch64) and the other cross-compilation (ARM64).
Sure, but either should be possible to build natively or using cross-compilation.

In theory yes - in practice I don't know if anyone has tried it. How would you do a native build using the ARM64 sources rather than the aarch64 sources?

My point was more that this is still not really clear. You now have a section that indicates you can do a native build on Aarch64, but then within the Cross-compilation section you have "Building for ARM/aarch64" which suggests to me that 64-bit is only done using cross-compilation. And the two different ports are only mentioned within that cross-compilation section.

Cheers,
David

/Magnus

David


/Magnus



Reply via email to