On 2020-04-29 13:23, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2020-04-29 13:02, jiefu(傅杰) wrote:
Hi all,
May I get reviews for this fix?
JBS: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8244097
Dang it! I thought I had tested bootcycle-images, but maybe that
wasn't the last iteration of my fix.
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jiefu/8244097/webrev.00/
No, I don't think this is the right way to solve it, by stopping
warnings from being errors. Let me get back to you with another approach.
As a short time solution, I suggest amending BOOT_JDK_SOURCETARGET when
running bootcycle builds instead.
As a more long term solution, I should probably sit down (at least
metaphorically) with someone from the compiler team and make a complete
pass over all our javac options. I think this warning ensues from
something we're doing incorrect, so we ought to fix it properly instead.
Patch inline:
diff --git a/make/autoconf/bootcycle-spec.gmk.in
b/make/autoconf/bootcycle-spec.gmk.in
--- a/make/autoconf/bootcycle-spec.gmk.in
+++ b/make/autoconf/bootcycle-spec.gmk.in
@@ -59,3 +59,6 @@
# Pandoc cannot be used without the jjs plugin, which was removed with
Nashorn.
ENABLE_PANDOC := false
+
+# Avoid "warning: [options] system modules path not set in conjunction
with -source"
+BOOT_JDK_SOURCETARGET := $(BOOT_JDK_SOURCETARGET) -Xlint:-options
/Magnus
/Magnus
Thanks a lot.
Best regards,
Jie
