Thanks Magnus for your review and nice help. It seems that your patch didn't fix the build failure when configure --with-boot-jdk=jdk15.
I've made : http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jiefu/8244097/webrev.01/ based on your work. Please review it and give me some advice. Thanks. Best regards, Jie On 2020/4/29, 7:49 PM, "Magnus Ihse Bursie" <magnus.ihse.bur...@oracle.com> wrote: On 2020-04-29 13:23, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote: > On 2020-04-29 13:02, jiefu(傅杰) wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> May I get reviews for this fix? >> >> JBS: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8244097 > Dang it! I thought I had tested bootcycle-images, but maybe that > wasn't the last iteration of my fix. >> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jiefu/8244097/webrev.00/ > No, I don't think this is the right way to solve it, by stopping > warnings from being errors. Let me get back to you with another approach. As a short time solution, I suggest amending BOOT_JDK_SOURCETARGET when running bootcycle builds instead. As a more long term solution, I should probably sit down (at least metaphorically) with someone from the compiler team and make a complete pass over all our javac options. I think this warning ensues from something we're doing incorrect, so we ought to fix it properly instead. Patch inline: diff --git a/make/autoconf/bootcycle-spec.gmk.in b/make/autoconf/bootcycle-spec.gmk.in --- a/make/autoconf/bootcycle-spec.gmk.in +++ b/make/autoconf/bootcycle-spec.gmk.in @@ -59,3 +59,6 @@ # Pandoc cannot be used without the jjs plugin, which was removed with Nashorn. ENABLE_PANDOC := false + +# Avoid "warning: [options] system modules path not set in conjunction with -source" +BOOT_JDK_SOURCETARGET := $(BOOT_JDK_SOURCETARGET) -Xlint:-options /Magnus > > /Magnus >> >> Thanks a lot. >> Best regards, >> Jie >> >
