On Wed, 2 Dec 2020 21:57:15 GMT, Erik Joelsson <er...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Interesting, I still able to run the build after this change on macOS >> 10.9.5. I use jdk image and there is no LC_VERSION_MIN_MACOSX in libjvm. >> libjli, libjava have one, and it's 10.9 > > The current intention is to be consistent with the min system version and > it's currently set to 10.9. If libjvm.dylib gets a different value, then that > would be a bug, but note that this could also vary depending on how the build > is configured and the compiler version used. > > So far, I have only bumped this version once, and that was because the > toolchain required it when switching to Clang from GCC. Keeping it low is > nice for backwards compatibility. That said, I don't see a problem with > increasing this value to 10.10 if it's needed for something. Even 10.10 was > EOL a long time ago now. The current value is set in make/autoconf/flags.m4. > > The discrepancy in Info.plist was fixed in JDK-8252145. We are indeed missing the macos-version-min argument when linking libjvm.dylib. This is a bug. ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/1569
