Hi Erik,

On 4/12/2020 12:07 am, Erik Joelsson wrote:
On Thu, 3 Dec 2020 04:34:52 GMT, David Holmes <dhol...@openjdk.org> wrote:

The signal-chaining facility was introduced in JDK 1.4 nearly 20 years ago and 
supported three different Linux signal API's: sigset, signal and sigaction:

https://docs.oracle.com/javase/8/docs/technotes/guides/vm/signal-chaining.html

Only sigaction is a Posix supported API for multi-threaded processes, that we 
can use cross-platform. Both signal and sigset are obsolete and have undefined 
behaviour in a multi-threaded process. From the Linux man pages:

sigset: This API is obsolete: new applications should use the POSIX signal API 
(sigaction(2), sigprocmask(2), etc.)

signal: The behavior of signal() varies across UNIX versions, and has also 
varied historically across different versions of Linux. Avoid its use: use 
sigaction(2) instead.

We should deprecate the use of signal and sigset in JDK 16 with a view to their 
removal in JDK 17.

A CSR request has been filed.

Testing: hotspot/jtreg/runtime/signal tests

Thanks,
David

make/modules/java.base/Lib.gmk line 131:

129: ifeq ($(call isTargetOsType, unix), true)
130:   ifeq ($(STATIC_BUILD), false)
131:     LIBJSIG_CFLAGS += -DHOTSPOT_VM_DISTRO='"$(HOTSPOT_VM_DISTRO)"'

In general, I would prefer if a flag like this was just inlined in the 
SetupJdkLibrary call, as there are no complex conditionals for setting it. 
Looking a bit further, the variable LIBJSIG_CFLAGS is dead and not set anywhere 
in the build, so could also just be removed and replaced with your new -D flag.

I thought about just inlining it but it seemed "obvious" that LIBJSIG_CFLAGS existed exactly for this purpose, so I simply set it there - taking care to expand it in case it was set directly on the command-line. It also followed what is done for LIBJLI_CFLAGS.

I can change it if you insist but this code will be very short-lived as I can remove it again in 17 once I no longer need the deprecation warning.

Thanks,
David

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/1587

Reply via email to