On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 06:10:17 GMT, Thomas Stuefe <stu...@openjdk.org> wrote:

> Hi @iklam,
> 
> this is a very welcome change!
> 
> Nothing much to add to what David wrote (include guards need renaming).
> 
> Apart from that, I was surprised that no gtests needed to be adapted, but 
> seems cds has no gtests?
> 
> I tested building without cds, works fine.
> 
> Thanks for doing this!
> 
> If you fix the include guards, this is fine by me.
> 
> ..Thomas

Hi Thomas, thanks for the review. You're right that we don't have any gtests 
.... that should be fixed at some point.

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/3610

Reply via email to