On Fri, 10 Sep 2021 10:02:43 GMT, David Holmes <dhol...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Currently, the build system defaults the libjvm.so location to "server". >> This makes looking for `libjvm.so` awkward, see JDK-8273487 for example. We >> need to see if moving the libjvm.so to a proper location breaks anything. >> >> Additional testing: >> - [x] Linux x86_64 Zero build >> - [x] Linux x86_64 Zero bootcycle-images >> - [x] Linux x86_64 Zero `tier1` > > It isn't the "formal governance" I'm concerned about, more about the folk who > use/rely on Zero being the ones to evaluate the impact of a change like this. > People, like myself, who do not use Zero in any way cannot evaluate whether > this change is appropriate - it's that simple. :) I'll be happy to integrate as long as @dholmes-ora has no objections. ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/5440
