On Fri, 4 Feb 2022 10:00:50 GMT, TheShermanTanker <d...@openjdk.java.net> wrote:
> If that's the case, I'm wondering if instead of changing > `18-internal+0-adhoc.shade.jdk (18-internal)` to something like > `18-internal-jdk-18+17-80-gcdf89304eaf.shade (18-internal)`, `build 18<+build > number, not required>-internal-<branch name + commit id>` would be more > understandable and slightly easier on one's eyes, while conveying the same > information the usual (verbose) version string otherwise tries to display We have been discussing this (see the bug comments in JIRA). The showstopper is that versions are captured during `configure`, which means you can configure on one branch, switch to another, and your build would still be recorded as produced by old branch. ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/6152
