On Wed, 12 Oct 2022 20:26:34 GMT, Jorn Vernee <jver...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> Following that logic: from our perspective `dlopen` violates its ABI in > certain cases. Preserving the control bits across calls to `dlopen` seems > like a pragmatic solution. I'm not sure how important it is to have an opt-in > for the current (broken) behavior... Not at all, I'd have thought. ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/10661
