On Tue, 18 Oct 2022 02:35:59 GMT, Jie Fu <ji...@openjdk.org> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> Let's disable `-Werror=strict-overflow` to get it build with gcc7 on 
> Linux/x86.
> 
> bytecodeAssembler.cpp
> instanceKlass.cpp
> klassVtable.cpp
> 
> 
> Thanks.
> Best regards,
> Jie

My CI reports the mainline failures with GCC 6 in the following configs:


linux-x86_64-server-fastdebug
linux-aarch64-server-fastdebug
linux-arm-server-fastdebug
linux-ppc64le-server-fastdebug
linux-s390x-server-fastdebug
linux-ppc64-server-fastdebug


This PR solves part of the failures, but some require more work:


diff --git a/make/hotspot/lib/CompileJvm.gmk b/make/hotspot/lib/CompileJvm.gmk
index 77d1ff6e21c..816eb4d9996 100644
--- a/make/hotspot/lib/CompileJvm.gmk
+++ b/make/hotspot/lib/CompileJvm.gmk
@@ -166,2 +166,3 @@ $(eval $(call SetupJdkLibrary, BUILD_LIBJVM, \
     DISABLED_WARNINGS_gcc_loopnode.cpp := sequence-point, \
+    DISABLED_WARNINGS_gcc_objArrayKlass.cpp := strict-overflow, \
     DISABLED_WARNINGS_gcc_postaloc.cpp := address, \


Since the warning seems to be caused by the popular header, it is likely to 
break some other platforms/files through the different include paths from the 
different compilation units. The warning also looks fairly dubious, and 
probably is GCC bug, as it does not trigger with higher GCCs? Because of this, 
I suggest we add `strict-overflow` back to the global warning exclusion list:


diff --git a/make/hotspot/lib/CompileJvm.gmk b/make/hotspot/lib/CompileJvm.gmk
index 6d4e01d1aed..534c50cc77a 100644
--- a/make/hotspot/lib/CompileJvm.gmk
+++ b/make/hotspot/lib/CompileJvm.gmk
@@ -94,6 +94,8 @@ DISABLED_WARNINGS_clang := ignored-qualifiers 
sometimes-uninitialized \
 ifneq ($(DEBUG_LEVEL), release)
   # Assert macro gives warning
   DISABLED_WARNINGS_clang += tautological-constant-out-of-range-compare
+  # Some reasonable asserts produce warnings on GCC <= 7
+  DISABLED_WARNINGS_gcc += strict-overflow
 endif
 
 DISABLED_WARNINGS_xlc := tautological-compare shift-negative-value

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/10738

Reply via email to