On Tue, 10 Jan 2023 22:59:20 GMT, Alexander Matveev <almat...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> What additional paths except "@executable_path/../Frameworks/" your > application requires? If you just need @executable_path/../Frameworks/, then > I think we should just add this to rpath permanently, instead of using > -headerpad_max_install_names and install_name_tool. "Frameworks" and > "PlugIns" are two standard folders to keep additional dynamic libraries, so I > think we need to add both of them and do not use -headerpad_max_install_names. For my specific use case it would just be Frameworks. But I agree that adding both of them would be an option as well which should cover most/all use cases. I've adjusted the pr > Looks good. You will need to file a JBS issue for this. Since I'm not a member of any JDK project, I've used https://bugreport.java.com/, thus the ID starts with a 9. Is that fine or should I wait until this gets transferred to an `JDK-` number? ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/11922
