On Mon, 6 Feb 2023 14:35:43 GMT, Adam Sotona <[email protected]> wrote:
>> src/java.base/share/classes/jdk/internal/classfile/Opcode.java line 39:
>>
>>> 37: */
>>> 38: public enum Opcode {
>>> 39: NOP(Classfile.NOP, 1, Kind.NOP),
>>
>> This also duplicates the constants in classfile...
>
> On the contrary, it has been deduplicated. Opcode is referencing numeric
> constants stored in Classfile.
sure, but my question is - once you have a nice enum that is 1-1 with the
opcodes - why would a client want to use the low-level opcode bytes? Shouldn't
the API only deal with Opcodes? (and, in the rare occurrence where a client
wants to really know the int value of an opcode, they can do e.g.
`PUTSTATIC.bytecode()`)
-------------
PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/10982
