On Tue, 7 Mar 2023 08:35:34 GMT, Adam Sotona <asot...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> I am unsure how you might use `BlockCodeBuilder`. If the current signature >> is not changed then `transformFromHandler` seems reasonable (since its the >> handler that pushes elements into its given builder). >> >> The other `transform` is implicitly "transform model". > > I'm sorry my answer was inaccurate, what I'm proposing is > `transformBlock(Consumer<BlockCodeBuilder>, CodeTransform)` or > `transformedBlock(Consumer<BlockCodeBuilder>, CodeTransform)`. > `BlockCodeBuilder` is just an extension of `CodeBuilder` with ability to > break block execution. > Block is a sub-unit of code, so I expect it would be a logical extension of > the actual `block(Consumer<BlockCodeBuilder>`. > I'll move this discussion to the mailing list to make common decision about > API change. > Thanks. This topic is now tracked as RFE ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/10982
