On Wed, 3 May 2023 20:00:42 GMT, Chris Plummer <cjplum...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Yes, the test was finicky with the heap size. Given that the leak it tries >> to provoke would be provoked by other GCs as well, we didn't think it was >> that important to run this particular test with Generational ZGC. If you >> still think that we should create a Bug and ProblemList it, I'll do so. > > When I first wrote this test, it ended up failing with ZGC because I hadn't > tested it. I considered excluding it for the same reason you've given, but > then considered that the test might expose a leak with one GC, but not > others, so I decided to fix it. I've created JDK-8307402. I'll push a problem list entry. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/13771#discussion_r1184308134
