On Fri, 26 May 2023 16:58:41 GMT, Thomas Stuefe <stu...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> The crazy thing is that `malloc` is defined! That means all places where we >> use the term malloc are getting replaced without such a workaround. (E.g. >> for log tags.) > > So, we do this only for malloc? Not for calloc, posix_memalign, realloc etc? > What about free? > > As ugly as defining malloc is (and I remember QADRT), I hesitate about > removing that define. > > Removing that define and hard-coding it here assumes 1) our replacement is > equivalent (ok, easy to check) 2) it will always be equivalent in future AIX > versions 3) pointers it returns work with the unchanged free() and realloc() > the system provides, and will always do so. > > I don't know... I would not do this just to get rid of a warning. This one is not just to get rid of a warning. We get real test errors because malloc gets replaced by vec_malloc in log tags. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/14146#discussion_r1207308708
