Hi, It looks like Adoptium is building with CentOS 6.10[1] which does not append --as-needed linker flag by default. This results in the .gnu_version section created and the bug worked around with Temurin builds. In Debian/Ubuntu the toolchain automatically uses -as-needed by default so we've forced the --no-as-needed flag recently[2] to resolve this issue[3]. I wonder if it is an acceptable solution to add '--no-as-needed' to BASIC_LDFLAGS in make/autoconf/flags-ldflags.m4 to have consistent linking?
Best Regards, Vladimir. [1] https://ci.adoptium.net/job/build-scripts/job/jobs/job/jdk17u/job/jdk17u-linux-x64-temurin/lastBuild/consoleFull [2] https://salsa.debian.org/openjdk-team/openjdk/-/commit/b9b80f7da869be0ee42fbb2dd18486b7b0a1826c [3] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1031521 On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 7:06 PM David Holmes <david.hol...@oracle.com> wrote: > > Hi Vladimir, > > This is not the first time this has come up: > > https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/build-dev/2020-February/026730.html > > but no real resolution. > > David > > On 27/06/2023 6:31 pm, Vladimir Petko wrote: > > Dear Maintainers, > > > > There is a bug[1] submitted in Debian that a number of games crash > > with the assertion > > > > Inconsistency detected by ld.so: dl-lookup.c: 107: check_match: > > Assertion `version->filename == NULL || ! _dl_name_match_p > > (version->filename, map)' failed! > > > > The investigation points to JAWT_GetAWT function from libjawt.so. > > > > In Java 8 the build system supplied a mapfile which set the symbol > > version for JAWT_GetAWT. It is no longer the case for Java 11+ due > > to JDK-8200178. > > If the native library was linked against Java 8 (e.g. lwjgl 2.x) then > > it would be linking against the versioned symbol. > > The assertion in the loader only fires when the version section > > (.gnu.version) is absent, otherwise the loader provides the default > > version of the function. This allows Temurin builds to work with those > > games. > > > > I wonder if some of the map files could be reverted for the > > compatibility reasons with Java 8, or it is not a recommended > > approach? > > > > [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1031521
