On Mon, 25 Sep 2023 07:13:49 GMT, Robbin Ehn <r...@openjdk.org> wrote:

> Capstone is not worked on by any rv folks, it had a init push of 'base' isa 
> 4y ago and left at that. Just this year it will around 5-10 new extension to 
> the ISA, with major ones as vector. Which means it would be us hotspot de. 
> that needs to everything in capstone. If so it would be easier to add the 
> disassembler to hotspot; we can unittest that you added the disassembler part 
> for your new instruction in the assembler.

Maybe, but would it really be easier? I don't see that it would be 
_significantly_ easier, and it would be much more riscv community friendly to 
work on the shared disassembler.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/15138#issuecomment-1733317308

Reply via email to