This question was brought up in https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/15096, the issue is that awt.dll has historically tried to avoid depending on msvcp.dll, and as https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/15096#issuecomment-1796303631 points out, it is unclear whether it is now safe to introduce a dependency to msvcp.dll in awt.dll since it is unclear whether msvcp.dll is now always distributed with the JDK, though I am fairly confident that it is (The fix in that PR is dependent on some facilities in the C++ Standard Library). Can anyone confirm whether this is the case?
best regards, Julian