On Wed, 7 Feb 2024 00:16:57 GMT, Jonathan Gibbons <j...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> There are two cases that need consideration:
>> 1. A tree that is not modified during the transformation, as in the test 
>> case here, so that all nodes should be "as before"
>> 2. A tree that is modified during the transformation, raising the issue of 
>> the positions of the new node and any enclosing node
>
> I found what I think was the issue, and I've pushed an initial fix for it, 
> which passes improved versions of existing tests.
> I'll follow up with more tests and perhaps include your test case here as 
> well; thanks for providing it.

Update: I've added your test case, which now passes OK.

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/16388#discussion_r1480724330

Reply via email to