On Mon, 5 Feb 2024 21:39:06 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie <i...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> Here is the full list: > https://clang.llvm.org/docs/DiagnosticsReference.html#wpedantic I know about that list, and that's not what I was asking for. I want to understand the impact on *our* code. What warnings are arising from *our* code, how difficult are the fixes, and how beneficial are the fixes. Looking through the list of warnings it can generate, I don't see much that looks useful. I'm inclined to agree with Andrew Haley's comment in (draft) https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/17727#issuecomment-1929178213. It might be that there are some specific warning options that are part of it that might be worth turning on (or working toward), but it's mostly uncompelling. The two that had bazillions of occurrences when I tried with gcc were (1) a gcc bug (incorrect warning about extra semis), and (2) a completely non-useful requirement that "%p" format spec only accepts exactly void*, with no implicit conversions from other pointer types. Clang presumably doesn't have the former, and I don't know about the latter. ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17687#issuecomment-1948881656
