On Thu, 4 Apr 2024 15:38:36 GMT, Erik Joelsson <er...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> FYI: This was trying to address a comment from @magicus >> https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/14787#discussion_r1514894494 Happy to >> not follow that convention and/or rename the tool. > > I was not aware of such a convention and I can't say I agree with it. It just > seems redundant and unnecessary, but I suppose we should wait for Magnus to > respond. Just to clarify: I did not say the name needed to be long, just that many (if not all) tools has used the convention of using the package name `build.tools.<toolname>` and the class name `<ToolName>.java`. I think the new name sounds 👍 . ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/14787#discussion_r1552430689
