On Mon, 1 Jul 2024 16:54:55 GMT, Hamlin Li <m...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Hi,
>> Can you help to review the patch?
>> This pr is based on previous work and discussion in [pr 
>> 16234](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/16234), [pr 
>> 18294](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/18294).
>> 
>> Compared with previous prs, the major change in this pr is to integrate the 
>> source of sleef (for the steps, please check 
>> `src/jdk.incubator.vector/linux/native/libvectormath/README`), rather than 
>> depends on external sleef things (header or lib) at build or run time.
>> Besides of this change, also modify the previous changes accordingly, e.g. 
>> remove some uncessary files or changes especially in make dir of jdk.
>> 
>> Besides of the code changes, one important task is to handle the legal 
>> process.
>> 
>> Thanks!
>> 
>> ## Test
>> tests:
>> * test/jdk/jdk/incubator/vector/
>> * test/hotspot/jtreg/compiler/vectorapi/
>> 
>> options:
>> * -XX:UseSVE=1 -XX:+EnableVectorSupport -XX:+UseVectorStubs
>> * -XX:UseSVE=0 -XX:+EnableVectorSupport -XX:+UseVectorStubs
>> * -XX:+EnableVectorSupport -XX:-UseVectorStubs
>> 
>> ## Performance
>> 
>> ### Options
>> * +intrinsic: 
>> 'FORK=1;ITER=10;WARMUP_ITER=10;JAVA_OPTIONS=-XX:+UnlockExperimentalVMOptions 
>> -XX:+EnableVectorSupport -XX:+UseVectorStubs'
>> * -intrinsic: 
>> 'FORK=1;ITER=10;WARMUP_ITER=10;JAVA_OPTIONS=-XX:+UnlockExperimentalVMOptions 
>> -XX:+EnableVectorSupport -XX:-UseVectorStubs'
>> 
>> ### Float
>> data
>> <google-sheets-html-origin style="caret-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); color: rgb(0, 
>> 0, 0); font-style: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: 400; 
>> letter-spacing: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; 
>> text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; 
>> -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; text-decoration: none;">
>> Benchmark | (size) | Mode | Cnt | Error | Units | Score +intrinsic 
>> (UseSVE=1) | Score -intrinsic | Improvement(UseSVE=1) | Score +intrinsic 
>> (UseSVE=0) | Score -intrinsic | Improvement (UseSVE=0)
>> -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | --
>> Float128Vector.ACOS | 1024 | thrpt | 10 | 0.015 | ops/ms | 245.439 | 101.483 
>> | 2.419 | 245.733 | 102.033 | 2.408
>> Float128Vector.ASIN | 1024 | thrpt | 10 | 0.013 | ops/ms | 296.702 | 103.559 
>> | 2.865 | 296.741 | 103.18 | 2.876
>> Float128Vector.ATAN | 1024 | thrpt | 10 | 0.004 | ops/ms | 196.862 | 49.627 
>> | 3.967 | 195.891 | 49.771 | 3.936
>> Float128Vector.ATAN2 | 1024 | thrpt | 10 | 0.021 | ops/ms | 135.088 | 32.449 
>> | 4.163 | 135.721 | 32.579 | 4.166
>> Float128Vector.CBRT | 1024 | thrpt | 10 | 0.004 | ops/ms | 114.547 | 39.517 
>> | 2....
>
> Hamlin Li has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge 
> or a rebase. The pull request now contains 33 commits:
> 
>  - Merge branch 'master' into sleef-aarch64-integrate-source
>  - merge master
>  - sleef 3.6.1 for riscv
>  - sleef 3.6.1
>  - update header files for arm
>  - add inline header file for riscv64
>  - remove notes about sleef changes
>  - fix performance issue
>  - disable unused-function warnings; add log msg
>  - minor
>  - ... and 23 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/2f4f6cc3...b54fc863

I have now wasted two hours trying to duplicate your results.

I need you to write here the _exact_ command line that produced your numbers 
above, along with the full configure and build options you used.

I also had problems with javac running out of heap space, which was very odd. I 
fixed it with this:


diff --git a/make/autoconf/boot-jdk.m4 b/make/autoconf/boot-jdk.m4
index 8d272c28ad5..617ccfd8fff 100644
--- a/make/autoconf/boot-jdk.m4
+++ b/make/autoconf/boot-jdk.m4
@@ -470,7 +470,7 @@ AC_DEFUN_ONCE([BOOTJDK_SETUP_BOOT_JDK_ARGUMENTS],
   # Maximum amount of heap memory.
   JVM_HEAP_LIMIT_32="768"
   # Running a 64 bit JVM allows for and requires a bigger heap
-  JVM_HEAP_LIMIT_64="1600"
+  JVM_HEAP_LIMIT_64="6400"

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/18605#issuecomment-2211202867
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/18605#issuecomment-2211202959

Reply via email to