On Wed, 5 Nov 2025 15:26:31 GMT, Jan Lahoda <[email protected]> wrote:
> Maybe the line needs to be draw closer to "the code is probably buggy/highly > suspicious". I'm OK with this more conservative approach, which should satisfy all the "real hackers": instead of warning for values outside of the range `[0,n)` (where `n` is 32 or 64), only warn for values outside of the range `(-n, n)`. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/27102#discussion_r2495106722
