On Tue, 3 Feb 2026 07:22:27 GMT, Kim Barrett <[email protected]> wrote:

>> Leo Korinth has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional 
>> commit since the last revision:
>> 
>>   Changes after comments from Erik and Kim
>
> There is some overlap in purpose between the build system changes here and
> those in my proposed change for JDK-8332189 
> (https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/29497).
> While this change is more general purpose, it's not obvious to me that it
> would actually get applied anywhere other than to HotSpot. Being selective
> about the scope for adding options has both good and bad points. That applies
> to both approaches. My feeling is the bad outweighs the good here. I don't
> think I like the idea of having ghettos within HotSpot where different warning
> options are applied.  We already have some of that with per-file disabling of
> warning, which we don't seem to be making much progress on reducing, even for
> HotSpot.
> 
> I've not made any attempt to seriously review the new infrastructure here. I'd
> prefer to leave that to people with a better understanding of makefile
> programming and of our build system.

I am not opposing your (@kimbarrett ) changes to warning flags and that is a 
great option if you can fix changes in all of hotspot. My changes are great 
when incrementally hardening the flags. I think my feature is really needed.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/29523#issuecomment-3842281488

Reply via email to